Published on 19 Jan 2017.
RAM Ratings has
reaffirmed the ratings of Purple Boulevard Berhad’s (the Issuer) Sukuk Ijarah of RM250
million in nominal value under its RM450 million asset-backed Sukuk Ijarah Programme (Sukuk Ijarah Programme).
The Issuer is a special-purpose vehicle sponsored by Nadin Holdings Sdn Bhd and
Nadin Management Sdn Bhd (the Servicer) (collectively, the Originators), and
had been incorporated for the securitisation of Ampang Point Shopping Centre
(Ampang Point or the Property).
Sukuk Ijarah
|
Rating/
Outlook
|
Amount
of up to
(RM
million)
|
Expected Maturity
Date
|
Legal
Maturity Date
|
Senior Class A
|
AAA/Stable
|
95
|
11
November 2022
|
10
May 2024
|
Senior Class B
|
AA3/Stable
|
15
|
13
November 2020
|
13
May 2022
|
Senior Class C
|
A3/Stable
|
15
|
13
November 2020
|
13
May 2022
|
Guaranteed Class D |
AAA(fg)/Stable
|
125
|
11 November 2022^
|
10 May 2024
|
Subordinated Class E |
Not Rated
|
200
|
11 November 2020
|
10 May 2024
|
^Known as the Class D Mandatory Prepayment
Date under the Class D Sukuk Ijarah.
The reaffirmation is
premised on the net property income (NPI) of Ampang Point that has remained in
line with RAM’s assumed sustainable NPI and supports our assessed capital value
of RM221.05 million. The collateral support offered by the Property, as
reflected by the loan-to-value and stressed debt service coverage ratios of the
respective Class A, Class B and Class C Sukuk
Ijarah, therefore remain commensurate with each rating category.
The rating reaffirmation for the Guaranteed Class D Sukuk Ijarah reflects its guarantor,
Danajamin Nasional Berhad’s credit standing, which was reaffirmed at AAA/Stable
on 6 December 2016.
For fiscal 2015 and
10M fiscal 2016, Ampang Point’s average occupancy rate (AOR) remained stable at
92%-94% while its average rental rate (ARR) improved to RM7.32–RM7.68 psf
(2014: RM6.99 psf), resulting in an improved NPI margin of around 73% (2014:
69%). We note the Servicer’s ongoing efforts to create additional lettable
space, improve the mall’s tenant mix and increase footfall, which have helped
sustain its performance. That said, the healthier NPI margin in 10M fiscal 2016
was also a result of upward rental revision for 2 sponsor-related tenants (to reflect
market rates) and the reapportionment of maintenance costs in October 2016
(applied retrospectively with effect from January 2016). On this note, we
expect its finance service coverage ratio (FSCR) for the full year to be at
around 1.60 times (above the covenanted level of 1.50 times), following the
said rental revisions and cost adjustments.
In the near term,
rental upside will be limited given the more challenging operating environment.
There will be a substantial incoming supply of new retail space over the next
few years, although this may not pose direct competition to Ampang Point. To
improve its operating efficiency, RM13 million of the issuance proceeds had
initially been earmarked for the refurbishment of the Property. However, only
RM0.4 million had been drawn from the Mall Refurbishment Account as at 25
November 2016, given the delay in executing its revised capex plans.
Meanwhile,
single-asset concentration risk remains one of the key moderating factors.
There is also tenant-concentration risk; its top 4 tenants account for 17.5% of
its gross rental income. Nonetheless, Ampang Point’s lease-maturity profile had
improved y-o-y, with a respective 24%, 31% and 30% of its leases (by gross
rental income) expiring in 2016, 2017 and 2018 as at end-August 2016.
Correspondingly, its weighted-average lease expiry increased to 2.39 years as
at the same date (2 July 2015: 2.02 years). Most of the leases that expired in
2016 were renewed, albeit mostly at the same rate.
At the Servicer/the
Originator level, we have noted that four key personnel have left the firm
since the inception of the transaction in November 2015; the Servicer has since
identified key personnel to better manage its roles and obligations under the
transaction. The change raises concerns about servicing quality in terms of the
Servicer’s familiarity and knowledge vis-à-vis its role and obligations in this
transaction. On this note, the Issuer had been late in meeting the FSRA’s first
monthly build-up (on top of the pre-funded reserves) for both the Senior Class
and Class D Sukuk, as well as the first annual principal build-up in the
Principal Reserve Account that fell due on 14 November 2016, by 1 and 9
business days, respectively, although subsequently remedied within the
allowable period. The finalisation and submission of the Issuer’s audited
accounts and management accounts for 1H fiscal 2016 had also been delayed. RAM
will continue to closely monitor and observe the Servicer’s plans in ensuring
continuous compliance to the terms of the transaction.
Analytical
contact
Tan Han Nee
(603) 7628 1023
Hannee@ram.com.my
Tan Han Nee
(603) 7628 1023
Hannee@ram.com.my
Media
contact
Padthma Subbiah
(603) 7628 1162
padthma@ram.com.my
Padthma Subbiah
(603) 7628 1162
padthma@ram.com.my
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.