11 August 2015
Credit Market Update
Commodity
Bloodbath Taking Tolls on Credits; Maintain Tactical on Olam 7/19
APAC USD CREDIT MARKETS
¨
CDS
moved slightly on equity rebound in China. Credit protection
costs widened 1bp to 114.2, reflected by the iTraxx AxJ IG despite the rebound
in Chinese equities market. Separately, the UST rose 1-6bps, with the 10y
adding 6bps to close below c.2.24%, with the markets rising expectation of a
Sep rate hike despite conflicting views from FOMC members on the timing.
¨
IG corporates
yields inched up 2bps to 3.18%.
Underperformers in this space were ANHAU 16s, TNBMK 25, BABA 34, HUWHY 27 along
with Chinese O&G names such as CNOOC, SINOPE, CNPCCH and SINOPC. We observed
that ORGAU 18-21s yields widened sharply after it was downgraded by Moody’s
from Baa2 to Baa3 with a stable outlook, the downgrade was to reflect its
completion of the divestment of Contact Energy, which has weakened its revenue
diversity, while its leverage profile remain unchanged. Contrastingly, HY
corporates tightened 1bp to close below 8.5%. Outperformers were led by
Chinese real estate HY names such as FTHDGR 17-20s, SHIMAO 21, GRNLHK 16,
CSCHCN 19 and CAPG 19s.
¨
China’s July
M2 money supply rose 13% y-o-y vs 11.8% in June, as lending to financial institutions last month
likely rose to halt the rout of the Chinese equities markets.
SGD CREDIT MARKETS
¨ Commodity headwinds deepened taking tolls on SGD
credits. There has been selling in
commodity names of late from lower prices and concerns on commodities traders’
opaque valuation treatments. Selling has been observed in the better part of
last week in SWIBSP, EZRASP, GGRSP due to last week’s Brent oil prices which
dipped below USD50/bbl, though it has rebounded slightly this week to around
USD50.2/bbl. Nevertheless, this is still below averages in June (USD63.7/bbl)
by c.21% and July (USD56/bbl) by c.11% as well while palm oil prices have seen
the same fate, hovering at MYR2,010/MT, below averages in June (MYR2,267/MT) by
c.11% and July (MYR2,187MT) by c.8%. There has also been more offers for NOLSP
and OLAMSP, even as fellow SGX-listed commodities-trader Noble yesterday
unveiled PWC’s report on their review of Noble’s accounting practices.
MALAYSIA CREDIT MARKETS
¨
Credit yields
moved higher following hike in govvies yields last week. Corporate flows improved by 32% to MYR404m, compared
to last week daily average of MYR306m. On widening trend, we note DanaInfra 4/21
on MYR115m trades inching 11bps higher to 4.158% (5yMGS + 35bps). In other
sectors, PLUS 1/21 was trading 6bps wider at 4.205%; although we also saw YTL
10/24 closing the day tighter at 4.731% (-2bps).
¨
Lackluster
sovereign flows as investors holding their position. Govvies market started the week on muted activity of
MYR527m as investors probably chose to hold their position at current level
after the hike in sovereign yields last week. Yields for the 3y-10y MGS
benchmark ended on downward bias, settling in between 3.30%-4.15% (-4bps to
+1bps). The 5yMGS reopening auction set to close today with the WI was trading
within the range of 3.80%-3.85%.
¨
Meanwhile, Malaysia’s
Industrial Production Index increased by 4.3% y-o-y in Jun-15, slightly
slower than 4.5% in May-15.
¨
TRADE IDEA: SGD
Bond(s)
|
OLAMSP 17/7/19 (NR) (Price: 104.1;
Yield: 4.634%; SIGB20 +264.3bps) (Amt o/s: SGD350m)
|
Comparable(s)
|
OLAMSP 22/7/19 (NR) (Price: 99.7; Yield:
4.333%; SIGB20 +240.2bps) (Amt o/s: SGD400m)
WILMAR 25/1/19 (NR) (Price: 101.2;
Yield: 3.741%; SIGB20 +172bps) (Amt o/s: SGD100m)
|
Relative Value
|
We maintain tactical on OLAMSP 17/7/19
for an attractive 24bps and c.90bps yield pickup against OLAMSP 22/7/19 and
WILMAR 1/19. Although OLAMSP 17/7/19 has widened c.20bps in yield since our
call on 8-July (hit by softer commodities such as corn and wheat which
declined 8%-9% to USD384/bu and USD521/bu respectively), it proved to be
slightly more resilient than WILMAR 1/19 given that spread has tightened 5bps
against the latter. We also see support from OLAMSP's commitment to
restructure its lower margin businesses as well as debts (to recap its S$97m
bond-buyback in 1Q15), strong shareholder (i.e. Temasek's 58.4% stake), and
to some extent the delay of a USD1.3bn acquisition of Archer Daniels
Midland's global cocoa business, which could bolster credit profile at least
for now. Though we advise caution ahead of its results scheduled to be
released this Friday.
|
Fundamentals
|
Aggressive investors may
consider OLAM's based on the following reasons:
1) Decent
profitability level with EBITDA growth of c.5% YoY
to SGD1.2bn and margin of 5.95%;
2) Good
access to capital despite moderate liquidity with
cash balance of SGD1.3bn against ST debts of SGD2.7bn but supported by
unutilized credit lines of SGD7.1bn, based on 1Q15 results.
3) Assumed
support by Temasek’s controlling stake of 58.4% in Olam
However, the risks to our call
would be:
4) High
leverage of 2.1x and growing net debt/EBITDA of 6.83x (Dec-14: 2.3x;
6.79x);
5) Earnings
volatility from commodities prices and slowing global growth.
¨ *All financials as at Mar-15.
|
¨
CREDIT UPDATE
Company/
Issuer
|
Sector
|
Country
|
Update
|
RHBFIC
View
|
Noble
Group Limited (“Noble”)
(M/S/F:
Baa3/Sta; BBB-/Neg; BBB-/Sta)
|
Commodities/Plantation
|
HK
|
Noble released its 2Q15
results with revenue of USD3.7bn (y-o-y: -49%-; q-o-q: -17%)
and EBITDA of USD220m (y-o-y: -2.5%; q-o-q: -25%), while its net profit
fell 4.5% y-o-y from USD66m to USD63m. Additionally its gearing level
remain elevated with a total debt of USD5.7bn which translates into a net
gearing and net debt/EBITDA of 0.8x and 4.6x respectively, as its
cash-to-short- term debt remains below 0.41x. Meanwhile, Noble interest
coverage ratio hovers in the region of 3.7x.
On the other hand, PwC’s
independent 3rd party review notes that Noble’s valuation
approach for contracts conform to both industry & accounting rules.
|
Maintain
underweight. We view that negative investor sentiment
will remain in the short-to-medium term and this is compounded by the
weak global commodities outlook, which continue to persist amid the
slow-down in the Chinese economy.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.