Published on 26 January 2015
RAM Ratings has revised the outlook on the
AA3 rating of Edaran SWM Sdn Bhd’s (Edaran or the Company) initial RM750
million issuance under its RM1 billion IMTN Programme (2012/2032) (the
Sukuk), from stable to positive. Concurrently, the rating has been
reaffirmed. The outlook revision is anchored by Edaran’s
better-than-expected financial results in the last 2 years. Should this
cost-saving trend continue over the next 2 years, the rating of the
Sukuk may be upgraded a notch or more. Edaran’s rating considers its
strong business and financial position, low counterparty risk and the
exposure of SWM Environment Sdn Bhd (SWME) and Edaran to tariff-revision
risk. Edaran is the main sub-contractor for its sister company, SWME,
which has been awarded a 22-year concession by the Government to
exclusively provide solid-waste collection services and public cleansing
services in the states of Johor, Negeri Sembilan and Melaka.
Edaran’s debt servicing indicators are expected to
improve significantly. “Following some RM120 million of operational cost
savings in fiscal 2013 and the first 8 months of 2014 amid
lower-than-anticipated wage expenses, the Company’s minimum annual
finance service coverage ratio (FSCR) is projected to come up to 3.46
times (compared to 2.70 times earlier),” notes Davinder Kaur Gill, RAM’s
Co-Head of Infrastructure and Utilities Ratings. “Thanks to stringent
distribution tests that limit payments to Edaran’s shareholders, all
costs savings to date have boosted the Company’s cash coffers and, in
turn, lifted its annual FSCR profile,” she adds.
In return for carrying out the services required by
SWME, Edaran receives fixed fees (a proportion of SWME’s fees under the
Concession Agreement (CA)) - provided it meets the straightforward
operational requirements stated in the CA. Besides, counterparty risk is
deemed low given that the ultimate and sole paymaster is the Solid
Waste and Public Cleansing Management Corporation (the Corporation, a
privatised body under the Ministry of Housing and Local Government),
which receives its funding from the Government. Despite some hiccups in
the past, payments from the Corporation have been prompt and remain in
adherence with the CA terms.
Any revision of SWME’s fees will cause a
corresponding change in Edaran’s fees. Notably, the Government has
exclusive and absolute discretion to decide on a review of the agreed
fees, even though the CA specifies the mechanism and a host of
considerations for such review. In this respect, our analysis assumes
that the fees remain constant throughout the tenure of the Sukuk.
Similar to other concession-based businesses, regulatory and force majeure risks are inherent.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.