Published on 16 October 2012
RAM Ratings has reaffirmed the
AA2(s) enhanced long-term rating of Sarawak Power Generation’s (“SPG” or “the
Company”) Serial Sukuk Musharakah (“Sukuk”) of up to RM215 million, with a
stable outlook. The enhanced rating remains supported by a strongly-worded
letter of support from Syarikat SESCO Berhad (“SESCO”) – Sarawak’s state
electricity company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sarawak Energy Berhad
(“SEB”).
SPG is an independent power
producer (“IPP”), which converted its 210 MW open-cycle, gas-turbine (“OCGT”)
facility to a 320 MW combined-cycle, gas-turbine (“CCGT”) facility in Tanjung
Kidurong, Bintulu, Sarawak. The OCGT comprise of 2 gas turbines (known as Units
7 and 8) which are connected to 2 heat-recovery steam generators (“HRSGs”) and
a steam-turbine generator (“STG”) (collectively known as “Unit 9”).
The Company’s sturdy business
profile stems from the favourable terms of its power purchase agreement (“PPA”)
with SESCO. The Company earns full capacity payments (“CPs”), so long as its
OCGT meet the operating parameters specified in the PPA. Furthermore, all risks
associated with fuel supply are assumed by SESCO, which is responsible for its
procurement, delivery and cost.
Based on RAM Ratings’ sensitivity
analysis, SPG is expected to generate a healthy average annual pre-financing
cashflow of around RM42 million, which translates into projected minimum and
average sukuk service coverage ratios (“SSCRs”) – with cash balances,
post-distribution, calculated over a 12-month period on semi-annual principal
repayment dates – of 1.39 times and 1.72 times respectively. This assumes that
the Company will optimise distributions to its shareholders while adhering to
its financial covenants throughout the tenure of the Sukuk on a forward-looking
basis. We note that excessive distributions in the near term, although allowed
by the distribution covenants, may weaken SPG’s debt coverage in the future.
Our assessment of SPG also takes
into account the problems encountered by Units 7 and 8, i.e. derated dependable
capacities and longer outages, due to the integration of these units into Unit
9. This resulted in CP losses of RM2.27 million (representing close to 5% of
SPG’s potential CPs per annum) in fiscal 2011. Nevertheless, under our
sensitised cashflow projections, which have factored in the abovesaid issues,
the Company’s debt-servicing ability is anticipated to remain intact.
Further, the absence of a formal
operation and maintenance agreement between SPG and SESCO raises the
possibility of disputes in the event of a breakdown. The arrangement outlined
in the PPA only covers broad issues on responsibility and compensation. As with
other IPPs, SPG is exposed to single-project risk.
Media contact
Jocelyn Chiang
(603) 7628 1124
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.